About
What this is
Section titled “What this is”Comparative AI is an independent academic research project with a narrow, explicit aim:
to build a topic-first, source-grounded, traceable, and contestable comparative atlas of AI governance across three jurisdictions — China, the United States, and the European Union.
Excellent overview literature on AI governance already exists in both Chinese and English. What remains scarce, especially as a freely accessible resource, is a body of work that combines the following three features:
- Horizontal, topic-by-topic comparison (rather than country-by-country surveys).
- Full traceability to primary texts — every claim on the site can be clicked through to the original document.
- Treating hard law, soft law, and corporate practice as three interrelated families of material, organised together. Frontier model behaviour, for instance, is often nowhere to be found in executive orders — it lives in Anthropic’s Responsible Scaling Policy. Voluntary industry standards, conversely, sometimes end up written into government guidance.
Who it is for
Section titled “Who it is for”- Policy researchers comparing across jurisdictions, who want to save time on primary-source retrieval.
- Compliance practitioners mapping statutory text onto concrete product decisions, who need a cross-checking starting point.
- Product managers and engineers trying to understand where company policy ends and external regulation begins.
- Students and newcomers seeking the skeleton of the field.
This site is not journalistic commentary for a general audience, nor is it legal advice from an attorney.
What this is not
Section titled “What this is not”- Not legal advice. For any concrete compliance question, please consult a practising lawyer.
- Not a news aggregator. We do not chase breaking stories or write reactive commentary.
- Not advocacy. The goal of comparison is to surface structural differences, not to rank systems as better or worse.
- Not a machine-translation product. All translations are human-reviewed; AI-assisted passages are explicitly marked.
Author
Section titled “Author”The site is maintained by an independent researcher working in the AI / LLM industry. Personal details and contact information are deliberately minimal. For formal collaboration or complaints, please use GitHub Issues.
Next steps
Section titled “Next steps”- To understand how editorial judgements are made → Methodology
- To start reading content → Topic comparisons
- To cite the site → Citation and disclaimer