Cybersecurity Law (CSL)
2017-06-01Law · NPC-SC
China's foundational cybersecurity statute; underlies later AI rules.
Drag or scroll horizontally; click any node to reveal its summary. Colors encode legal tier.
Law · NPC-SC
China's foundational cybersecurity statute; underlies later AI rules.
Normative doc · State Council
The origin of China's national AI strategy.
Normative doc · AI Committee
First official articulation of "agile governance" as a paradigm.
Law · NPC-SC
Establishes data classification + cross-border review framework.
Law · NPC-SC
China's GDPR-equivalent; includes automated-decision and de-identification clauses.
Dept rule · CAC + 3 ministries
The starting point of China's algorithm governance; introduces algorithm filing.
Dept rule · CAC + 2 ministries
Among the world's earliest dedicated deepfake regulations.
Dept rule · CAC + 6 ministries
World's first regulation dedicated to generative AI services.
Dept rule · MOST + 9 ministries
Establishes dual-track ethics review; includes AI catalog.
Admin regulation · State Council
State-Council-level legal basis for the "minors mode" design.
Technical standard · TC260
Recommended in name, de-facto mandatory; the technical template for filing.
Normative doc · CAC / TC260
Mark of the shift from scenario-based to systemic AI governance.
Dept rule · CAC + 3 ministries
World's earliest mandatory dual-track (explicit + implicit) content-labeling regime.
Technical standard · national (mandatory)
Mandatory national standard; effective the same day as the Labeling Measures.
Normative doc · CAC / TC260
Extended 1.0; adds dedicated GPAI + frontier-model chapters.
Dept rule · Draft for comment
Sister rule to Anthropomorphic Measures; covers virtual anchors / digital employees.
Dept rule · CAC + 4 ministries
World's first regulation dedicated to AI companion / virtual-partner services.
Chinese regulation of AI is not a single “AI Act” but a superposition of rules across five hierarchical levels (位阶). Distinguishing among these levels matters: the various “Interim Measures” (暂行办法) and “Administrative Provisions” are departmental rules — whether issued by a single ministry or jointly by several ministries — they are neither laws of the National People’s Congress (NPC) nor administrative regulations of the State Council.
| Level | Enacting Body | Typical Form | Examples on This Site |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Laws | National People’s Congress and its Standing Committee | …Law (《…法》) | CSL · DSL · PIPL |
| 2. Administrative regulations | State Council | …Regulations (《…条例》) | Regulations on the Protection of Minors Online |
| 3. Departmental rules | State Council ministries, individually or jointly | …Measures / …Provisions / …Interim Measures | Algorithm Recommendation Provisions · Deep Synthesis Provisions · Generative AI Interim Measures · Labeling Measures · Anthropomorphic Interaction Services Measures 🆕 · Science & Tech Ethics Review Measures |
| 4. Normative documents | Ministries / dedicated committees | Framework / Principles / Guidelines | Safety Governance Framework 1.0/2.0 · New-Generation AI Governance Principles |
| 5. Technical standards | Standardization committees (TC260 etc.) / SAMR (for GB national standards) | GB / GB/T / TC260-XXX | TC260-003-2024 · GB 45438-2025 |
⚠️ Key caveat: Level 3 — “departmental rules” — is the operative front line of Chinese AI governance. Instruments such as the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services — the very word “Interim” (暂行) notwithstanding — have the legal hierarchy of a departmental rule (Level 3), not a State Council administrative regulation (Level 2). When scholars refer to “China’s AI rules,” this is predominantly what they mean.
A paper-style explanation (drawing on Zhang Linghan 张凌寒, Xue Lan 薛澜, and others):
The cost: Departmental rules sit at a relatively low rung on the hierarchy → firms find it hard to gauge the stability of rules and the elastic edges of enforcement → predictability is an intrinsic tension of the Chinese model.
AI-specific:
Cross-cutting:
This site’s classification of “hard law vs. soft law” is independent of legal hierarchy. For example:
See Methodology §2 · Hard-law/soft-law classification.
The following rules exist and are important but their AI proximity is insufficient to warrant a dedicated Rule page here. They are referenced via cross-links from related Rule pages:
See Methodology §1 · Inclusion criteria.
Click a tier to expand its rules. Higher tier (smaller number) = greater legal force.